• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

State of Elections

William & Mary Law School | Election Law Society

Hide Search

Multi-Member Districts in the U.S. Virgin Islands

Election Law Society · February 18, 2022 ·

By: Leo Jobsis-Rossignol

Since the United States Supreme Court first found multi-member districts to be a method of vote dilution in violation of the Voting Rights Act, they have become a less and less popular way of electing legislators. Today, only ten states allow the use of multi-member districts, and only for state legislature elections. Most frequently, these are restricted to state Houses of Representatives in a bicameral legislature, and even there, relatively few members are elected from them. However, they have not gone out of vogue everywhere, and their presence can have a profound impact.

One place still highly reliant on multi-member district-elected representatives is the U.S. Virgin Islands. Made up of just the tiny islands of St. Thomas, St. John, St. Croix, and surrounding cays, drawing 15 districts for all of the territorial senators sitting in its unicameral legislature would be difficult, and given how freely inhabitants can move from place to place in the small space, likely futile. Instead, the territory has opted for just two districts, St. Thomas-St. John and St. Croix, with an additional at-large senator elected across the islands. Each district elects 7 senators.

There have been complaints about this, from both the federal government and local organizations, claiming that the multi-member district scheme doesn’t serve the needs of the community. Without more individualized representation, who do community members in need go to? In 2019, enough pressure was mounted that an initiative made it on to the ballot, replacing the current scheme with five districts, four of which would have two senators apiece and one of which had only one, as well as providing for the election of six at-large senators. Even though the measure won a majority of votes, it was not put into effect: Virgin Islands ballot initiatives must be approved by a majority of voters in an election in which a majority of registered voters participate. Since turnout was actually under 10%, the law remained unchanged.

But why have this two-district multi-member scheme in the first place? When Governor Paiewonsky was asked about this at a Congressional hearing in 1966, he explained aptly that the two island groups broadly making up the U.S. Virgin Islands—St. Thomas-St. John and St. Croix—had been governed separately under the old colonial administration. Each island also had its own division into country and city districts. As a result, those from the country and those from the city did not trust one another, and those from different islands saw even less in common with one another. When the elected legislature was set up, it was decided that this problem had to be overcome, and so the apportionment and election system focused on unity over other objectives. Having all of an island’s senators elected by the whole of the island, and all citizens vote for an at-large member, framed the legislative function of government as a collaborative one, rather than one subject to disquiet and division.

Due to the Virgin Islands high standards for ballot initiatives, it is likely that the legislature will remain as is for the foreseeable future. Perhaps it will give American voters nationwide a look into an alternative political system, to see what might have been.

U.S. Virgin Islands apportionment and election systems, ballot initiative, ballot standards, ballots, Election Reform, multi-member districts, territorial election reform

Primary Sidebar

Pages

  • About Us
  • Election Law Glossary
  • Staff History
  • Links
  • Archived Pages
    • Citizens United + The States
    • Virginia Redistricting Competition

Search

View Posts by State

Archives

Tags

2016 Election 2020 Election Absentee ballots absentee voting Ballot Access ballot initiative Campaign Finance Citizens United Colorado Disenfranchise disenfranchisement Early Voting Election 2016 Electronic Voting Felon Voting Rights First Amendment Gerrymandering in-depth article judicial elections mail-in voting National Voter Registration Act North Carolina photo ID primary election Redistricting Referendum Registration Secretary of State state of elections Supreme Court Texas Virginia Vote by mail Voter Fraud Voter ID Voter Identification voter registration Voter Turnout voting voting and COVID Voting Machines Voting Rights Voting Rights Act VRA William & Mary

Blogroll

  • Election Law Issues
  • William & Mary Law School
  • Williamsburg Redistricting – "The Flat Hat" article

Friends

  • W&M Election Law Program

Contact Information:

To contact us, send an email to
wmstateofelections@gmail.com

Current Editorial Staff

Brendan W. Clark ’24, Editor-in-Chief
Rachel Clyburn ’24, Editor-in-Chief

State of Elections

Copyright © 2025 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok