• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

State of Elections

William & Mary Law School | Election Law Society

Hide Search

Archives for February 2014

Fusion Voting in the Empire State

Election Law Society · February 12, 2014 ·

By Brad Smith

Fusion voting, or collateral endorsement, is the process through which a candidate for public office can be listed as the candidate for more than one party. This process was very common in thenineteenth century, although today it is an uncommon practice, and New York Is the only state where fusion voting has a noticeable impact. In recent months, however, New York politicians have debated the usefulness and wisdom of the practice. [Read more…] about Fusion Voting in the Empire State

Vote By Mail: More about Stability than Turnouts

Election Law Society · February 10, 2014 ·

By Michael Althouse

When people discuss Oregon’s vote by mail system, it is usually credited as a reason for a high voter turnout.  Although Oregon has generally  had higher voter turnouts than the rest of the nation since the passage of mandatory vote by mail, correlation does not necessarily equal causation.  Recent studies have called into question whether vote by mail is responsible for the increased voter turnouts.  If it turns out that vote by mail does little or nothing to increase voter turnout, what is the future of vote by mail?  Are there any other benefits to having the good ol’ United States Post Office drop off your ballot? [Read more…] about Vote By Mail: More about Stability than Turnouts

Citizens United and the Arkansas Supreme Court Race

Election Law Society · February 3, 2014 ·

by Euticha Hawkins

Like twenty-two other states, Arkansas selects its supreme court justices via popular election.  The role of money in high court elections has always been an uncomfortable topic, but the specter of Citizens United threatens to transform this state of discomfort into one of true alarm.  Although Arkansas had no express limits on corporate election expenditures before Citizens United, the decision can only embolden corporations seeking to inject more money in Arkansas’s political process.   [Read more…] about Citizens United and the Arkansas Supreme Court Race

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2

Primary Sidebar

Pages

  • About Us
  • Election Law Glossary
  • Staff History
  • Links
  • Archived Pages
    • Citizens United + The States
    • Virginia Redistricting Competition

Search

View Posts by State

Archives

Tags

2016 Election 2020 Election Absentee ballots absentee voting Ballot Access ballot initiative Campaign Finance Citizens United Colorado Disenfranchise disenfranchisement Early Voting Election 2016 Electronic Voting Felon Voting Rights First Amendment Gerrymandering in-depth article judicial elections mail-in voting National Voter Registration Act North Carolina photo ID primary election Redistricting Referendum Registration Secretary of State state of elections Supreme Court Texas Virginia Vote by mail Voter Fraud Voter ID Voter Identification voter registration Voter Turnout voting voting and COVID Voting Machines Voting Rights Voting Rights Act VRA William & Mary

Blogroll

  • Election Law Issues
  • William & Mary Law School
  • Williamsburg Redistricting – "The Flat Hat" article

Friends

  • W&M Election Law Program

Contact Information:

To contact us, send an email to
wmstateofelections@gmail.com

Current Editorial Staff

Brendan W. Clark ’24, Editor-in-Chief
Rachel Clyburn ’24, Editor-in-Chief

State of Elections

Copyright © 2026 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok