• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

State of Elections

William & Mary Law School | Election Law Society

Hide Search

Vote Centers are here to stay in Indiana

Election Law Society · January 11, 2012 ·

by Shanna Reulbach

Indiana is one of several states pioneering vote centers, which are consolidated polling places open to any eligible voter in a locality. Vote centers came into existence in 2003, when Larimer County, Colorado first pioneered the configuration. Today, nine states have laws permitting vote centers, but Indiana was the first to use them on a large scale.

In 2006, the Indiana Secretary of State began a pilot program, allowing counties to test vote centers to determine if they would be an effective means of election day administration. Three counties, Cass, Tippecanoe, and Wayne, participated in the program from 2007 to 2010, and their reports prompted the state legislature to pass a bill during its 2011 session to enable all counties to adopt the vote center model as their permanent method for voting.

The law allows counties to transition to vote centers upon the unanimous vote of the county board of elections. No state approval is required; the county just has to file a plan with the Indiana Election Division. Already, two more counties, Vanderburgh and Fayette, submitted plans for making vote centers of their own. As required by the legislation, the plans address every detail of the new configuration, from the vote centers’ geographic locations to the number of staff that will man them on election day. The legislature presumably wanted to ensure that the counties would carefully prepare for the amount of people who could turn up at any vote center.

Despite the inherent risk of overcrowding and the possible confusion involved with educating people for the initial transition to vote centers, voters and administrators alike seem to prefer the new system. For officials, the cost of running an election based on the vote center model is a major selling point. During a panel discussion on vote centers, the county clerks from the three counties involved in the pilot program shared their views on the configuration. The panelists agreed that by reducing the number of polling places, vote centers save money on facilities fees and help overcome the more basic challenge of locating enough HAVA-compliant locations. Furthermore, with fewer polling places, counties do not have to purchase, store, transport, and maintain as many voting machines.

The county clerks also described some nonfinancial benefits. They reported that the decreased demand for election day staff has been a positive result because it was always a challenge to find enough people to work at all of the polling places. With vote centers, which almost halved the number of required personnel, not only are there an adequate number of volunteers, but resources can be centralized to better train those poll workers. This provides more opportunities for one-on-one training, which is particularly important given the increasing technological complexity of voting machines and electronic poll books.

For the voter, the benefits relate to convenience. Because anyone living within a county can use any vote center, there is no risk that someone will go to the wrong polling place and get turned away. Or as the Larimer County Election Website puts it, “there is no wrong place to vote.” Voters enjoy this freedom of choice, and they also like that they can go to the polls with friends and relatives who live outside of their old precincts. Sharing transportation and participating together in a civic duty helps increase peoples’ sense of community. In fact, voters in the pilot counties liked the new system so much that, according to the panelists, they were calling their county clerk’s offices asking how they could help support permanent legislation.

With reported benefits for voters and administrators alike, Indiana could witness more of its counties turning over to vote centers in the near future. This could have broader implications than even expected because statistics suggest that vote centers increase turnout by as much as 15% in counties that adopt the model. Perhaps vote centers can help revitalize democratic participation by engaging more voters in a more efficient electoral process.

Shanna Reulbach is a second-year student at William and Mary Law.

Permalink: http://stateofelections.pages.wm.edu/?p=3763

in-depth article

Mildred became pregnant and to avoid the prospective scandal chaplin married her. find out

All States IN vote centers, in-depth article, Indiana, Shanna Reulbach, Voter Turnout, voting center

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Vote Centers are Here to Stay in Indiana | State of Elections - The Voting News » The Voting News says:
    January 11, 2012 at 12:22 pm

    […] Article: IN (vote centers) Vote Centers are Here to Stay in Indiana : State of Elections. Indiana Add comments Topics: Larimer County, vote […]

Primary Sidebar

Pages

  • About Us
  • Election Law Glossary
  • Staff History
  • Links
  • Archived Pages
    • Citizens United + The States
    • Virginia Redistricting Competition

Search

View Posts by State

Archives

Tags

2016 Election 2020 Election Absentee ballots absentee voting Ballot Access ballot initiative Campaign Finance Citizens United Colorado Disenfranchise disenfranchisement Early Voting Election 2016 Electronic Voting Felon Voting Rights First Amendment Gerrymandering in-depth article judicial elections mail-in voting National Voter Registration Act North Carolina photo ID primary election Redistricting Referendum Registration Secretary of State state of elections Supreme Court Texas Virginia Vote by mail Voter Fraud Voter ID Voter Identification voter registration Voter Turnout voting voting and COVID Voting Machines Voting Rights Voting Rights Act VRA William & Mary

Blogroll

  • Election Law Issues
  • William & Mary Law School
  • Williamsburg Redistricting – "The Flat Hat" article

Friends

  • W&M Election Law Program

Contact Information:

To contact us, send an email to
wmstateofelections@gmail.com

Current Editorial Staff

Brendan W. Clark ’24, Editor-in-Chief
Rachel Clyburn ’24, Editor-in-Chief

State of Elections

Copyright © 2023 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in