Early Voting

Early Voting is Thriving in Virginia’s 2022 Midterms

Election Law Society · November 4, 2022 ·

By Noble Pearson

Over the past several years, Virginia has expanded early voting in the state with new legislation. In April 2020, former Governor Ralph Northam signed HB1/SB111 into law, which allows any registered voter to vote up to forty-five days prior to an election by absentee ballot in any election in which that person is qualified to vote with no excuse required. On that same day, Northam also signed HB238/SB455, which allows absentee ballots to be counted if they are postmarked on or before the day of an election and are received by the general registrar by noon on the third day after the election. The next year, in March of 2021, Northam signed HB1968 into law, which permits local election boards to offer absentee voting in person on Sundays during the early voting period leading up to an election. Before these changes, voting by absentee ballot had been restricted to voters meeting specific requirements, such as being an out-of-area student or a member of the armed forces residing temporarily out-of-state. The 2020 and 2021 changes thus expanded access for Virginia voters regarding early voting, particularly in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Since the passage of these new laws expanding early voting, Virginia has held two elections with extremely high turnout in 2020 and 2021. 2020 saw a contentious presidential election, and 2021 included statewide contests for Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and General Assembly seats. We are now approaching the first midterm election since the new laws referenced above have been passed. There are no state elections on the ballot this time, and only a handful of competitive races for U.S. Congress, but turnout is still expected to be high. Some are suggesting that deep political divisions in the state concerning topics such as the economy, abortion, and Donald Trump will motivate increased voter participation in this election, especially early participation.

While, at the time of writing, we are still two weeks away from election day itself, high numbers of early voters are making news around the Commonwealth. In the 2018 midterm election, the last midterm election before the new laws went into effect, the grand total of early voters was around 345,000. As of October 19, 2022, more than 302,000 votershad already voted early, with nearly three weeks remaining. Suffolk General Registrar Burdette Lawrence claims that Suffolk has received near-presidential race levels of early votes. Reports from around the state, including Roanoke, Richmond, and Prince William County, indicate that early voting is taking place at significant levels. With increased access and strong political motivation, the popularity of early voting and voting by mail seem to be rising.

With many challenges remaining for election officials, there is also hope that early voting provides an avenue to mitigate other election concerns. Experts are bracing for map-based confusion in this election, as the voting maps in Virginia have changed following post-census redistricting. Additionally, there have been recent reports of printing errors wreaking havoc in northern Virginia, with election officials in Fairfax and Prince William counties reporting that over 31,000 voters received documents indicating incorrect polling locations. The good news is that early voting may help alleviate some of these issues, as county election officials have recommended early voting as a possible way to proactively avoid confusion regarding polling location on election day.

The November 2022 midterm election in Virginia is yet to be complete, but it is clear that Virginia’s recent legal changes to expand access to early voting are leading to increased voter turnout. With the voting numbers already closing in on those of the previous midterm in 2018, all expectations are that there will be a noted increase in midterm voter turnout this election. Prince William County registrar Eric Olsen has said that the state should expect to see even more early voting in the remaining days before the election, with voters often procrastinating until the last few days before the election to cast an early vote.

It is easy to see why expanded early voting is so popular. Early voting is safer, easier, and more accessible than ever before, and may well lead to enhanced civic engagement. In a time of contentious politics and heightened division, voting is increasingly important to members of both political parties. In fact, support in Virginia for early voting has been largely bipartisan, with Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin’s embrace of early voting playing a part in his 2021 election. Politics aside, the ability to vote is a fundamental part of American civil life. As Virginia is demonstrating, expanded access to voting results in expanded interest in voting, which is good for democratic participation. Long may it continue.

New Jersey: An Experiment in Early Voting Expansion

Election Law Society · January 31, 2022 ·

By: Tim Intelisano

Earlier this year, New Jersey expanded in person early voting in the state. Now, that legislation was put to the test in the 2021 general election in early November.

Thus far, it has not been smooth sailing. For one, many counties struggled to recruit enough poll workers. This is an issue that other states, including Ohio, also bemoaned this year. The concern in New Jersey was so severe that newly re-elected Governor Phil Murphy used an executive order to raise the pay of election workers. The pay raise was modest—going from $200 to $300 dollars for a day’s work. It did not escape notice that workers in the June primary were paid $400 dollars for a day of service, though that higher award was attributed almost exclusively to the dangers and uncertainty around coronavirus. Additionally, Governor Murphy’s executive order also permitted poll workers to work outside of the county where they resided. Officials felt that this would be a useful tool for municipalities, since for unknown reasons some towns and counties just had an easier time signing up the requisite number of poll workers.

Voting Early in Arizona? Make Sure You’re Still on the List First.

Election Law Society · December 1, 2021 ·

By: Mike Arnone

In the wake of the 2020 Election, states across the country have enacted a variety of more restrictive voting laws. Over 400 bills that make voting more difficult have been introduced in 49 states. 30 of these have become law in 18 states. Arizona is no exception to this trend.

In May 2021, Governor Ducey signed SB 1485 into law, making significant changes to the state’s early voting procedures. Effective after the 2024 election, the new law will recast Arizona’s former Permanent Early Voting List (PEVL) as the Active Early Voting List. As the former’s name suggests, voters could indefinitely remain on Arizona’s early voting list and automatically receive a ballot in the mail for any election in which they were eligible to vote. Now, if a voter doesn’t use their early ballot once in two election cycles (once in four years), county election officials are required to purge them from the early voting list if they do not respond within 90 days to a notice warning them of their impending removal. A voter can still be removed from this list if they have voted in person instead of using their early mail ballot in two election cycles. Voters would still remain registered to vote whether or not they were removed from the early voting list.

Mail-in Ballots: Pennsylvania’s Latest Lawsuit on Election Rules

Election Law Society · October 29, 2021 ·

By: Christopher Chau

When Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed Act 77 into law on October 31, 2019, state legislators from both sides of the aisle hailed it as a bipartisan triumph as the state formally legalized no-excuse mail-in voting. Pennsylvania Republicans voted overwhelmingly for the bill, with 27-0 in the Senate and 105-2 in the House. In fact, the Democrats were more divided, with a majority in both chambers voting against the bill. In an interview with CNN, Republican Pennsylvania State Senate Majority Leader, Jake Corman, stated, “What’s important is that people have faith in the system…the elections process matters—it matters a great deal in a democracy.” As COVID-19 ravaged the nation in 2020, Act 77 became Pennsylvania voters’ relief to vote safely and privately during the uncertainty of the pandemic.

Did the Scope of the Texas Governor’s Authority to Suspend Election Law Under the Texas Disaster Act Expand to Include Policy Unrelated to Mitigating an Emergency?

Election Law Society · October 15, 2021 ·

By: Sarah Depew

On March 13, 2020, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued a proclamation declaring a state of disaster due to the COVID-19 pandemic, triggering gubernatorial emergency powers authorized in the Texas Disaster Act of 1975. The Texas Disaster Act gives the Governor the authority to “suspend the provisions of any regulatory statute. . . . if strict compliance with the provisions, orders, or rules would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay necessary action in coping with a disaster.” Using this authority, Gov. Abbott issued a proclamation on July 27, 2020, to expand early voting and suspend portions of the Texas Election Code to allow voters to deliver a marked ballot in person to the early voting clerk’s office before or on Election Day. An “early voting clerk’s office” is understood in both the Texas Election Code and the July Proclamation to include more than the voting clerk’s main office, but also, any satellite offices or locations. For example, Harris County’s Election Administration has ten offices serving 4.7 million residents across 1,777 square miles.

The July Proclamation was not controversial. The order stated that strict compliance with statute governing the return of marked ballots would hinder the state’s coping with COVID—an objective that is indisputably permissible under the Texas Disaster Act.