• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

State of Elections

William & Mary Law School | Election Law Society

Hide Search

Texas Takes Steps to End Mail-In Voter Fraud

Election Law Society · February 19, 2018 ·

Amid the passage of controversial voter ID laws, this session Texas lawmakers also tackled a different form of voter fraud in a significantly less controversial manner. The Texas Legislature took steps to end voter fraud stemming from mail-in ballots. Senate Bill 5 passed the legislature and was signed into law on June 15. The law becomes effective on January 1, 2018. This law expands the definition of mail-in voter fraud and increases the penalties for the crime. Several voter fraud cases were prosecuted in recent years, and there have been concerns from individuals who received mail-in ballots they never requested.

A recent Dallas city council election had approximately 700 suspicious mail-in ballots submitted, which was one of the primary factors driving this bill. This contested election went to a runoff which resulted in a loss for the incumbent, the result those suspected of voter fraud wanted to obtain. While it is unknown how many of the 700 ballots actually were fraudulent, the large number of suspicious ballots is certainly a valid concern for legislators to address.

One of the biggest concerns with this law is the harsh penalties, as those who violate the law could face between two and ten years in prison. Opponents are concerned that those who are not voting fraudulently, but instead fill out their own absentee ballot without the proper degree of care, could end up in prison for a simple mistake. While an optimist would think that prosecutorial discretion would prevent such oversight, that might not be realistic. It could turn into a way to target voters of opposing political parties. While it is unclear if the law will be used in this manner, it is something Texas voters should be aware of going forward.

In Texas, mail-in voting is only allowed for specific circumstances, not for every voter. The legislature chose to address fraud relating to the provisions they already have instead of expanding mail-in voting to more individuals. In terms of the legislature’s motivation, it seems that this law was passed with the primary goal of fixing what is wrong with the current system. They could have opted to expand voting, however that could increase the frequency of fraud, or at least allegations of fraud.

The passage of Senate Bill 5 included the repeal of a Nursing Home provision. The Nursing Home provision would have created a more structured process for the collection of ballots at nursing homes. Election judges of each political party would have gone to nursing homes with ballots and to oversee voting. Proponents claim that this would prevent voter fraud, discourage undue influence, and make the process easier for the elderly. The removal of the provision was opposed by Democrats and some Republicans. If the provision remained in the bill, it would have expanded the ability to vote to people who might not otherwise have that opportunity.

Overall this law seems to be a positive step to curbing an actual problem in Texas elections. While it is hard to know whether or not this will be successful in action, other states may follow suit if the changes seem to be effective.

All States ballots by mail, runoff voting, Senate Bill 5, state of elections, Texas Voter ID, Voter Fraud, Voter Identification

Primary Sidebar

Pages

  • About Us
  • Election Law Glossary
  • Staff History
  • Links
  • Archived Pages
    • Citizens United + The States
    • Virginia Redistricting Competition

Search

View Posts by State

Archives

Tags

2016 Election 2020 Election Absentee ballots absentee voting Ballot Access ballot initiative Campaign Finance Citizens United Colorado Disenfranchise disenfranchisement Early Voting Election 2016 Electronic Voting Felon Voting Rights First Amendment Gerrymandering in-depth article judicial elections mail-in voting National Voter Registration Act North Carolina photo ID primary election Redistricting Referendum Registration Secretary of State state of elections Supreme Court Texas Virginia Vote by mail Voter Fraud Voter ID Voter Identification voter registration Voter Turnout voting voting and COVID Voting Machines Voting Rights Voting Rights Act VRA William & Mary

Blogroll

  • Election Law Issues
  • William & Mary Law School
  • Williamsburg Redistricting – "The Flat Hat" article

Friends

  • W&M Election Law Program

Contact Information:

To contact us, send an email to
wmstateofelections@gmail.com

Current Editorial Staff

Brendan W. Clark ’24, Editor-in-Chief
Rachel Clyburn ’24, Editor-in-Chief

State of Elections

Copyright © 2025 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok