• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

State of Elections

William & Mary Law School | Election Law Society

Hide Search

Orlando’s redistricting advisory board may not please everyone

Election Law Society · November 30, 2011 ·

According to the 2010 census, the population of Orlando, FL has increased significantly over the past ten years, jumping from 185,951 in 2000 to a whopping 238,916 in 2010. This change in population has not occurred evenly over the city’s six districts, and new districts must be drawn as a remedy. This process is called redistricting.

Redistricting seeks to equalize representation in malapportioned districts. In Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims, two landmark United States Supreme Court decisions, the idea of equal representation came about through the notion of one person, one vote: “Whatever the means of accomplishment, the overriding objective must be substantial equality of population among the various districts, so that the vote of any citizen is approximately equal in weight to that of any other citizen in the State.”

In order to achieve a more even and representative portrait of Orlando, the Orlando City Council appointed a nine member board to handle the task of redistricting. In coming up with a proposed plan, the Redistricting Advisory Board also sought and received the input of many other Orlando citizens.

In the end, after dozens of meetings, emails, and letters, the Board submitted a proposed plan to the Orlando City Council. The plan seems to roughly divide Orlando’s population evenly over the six districts. The proposed figures for districts one through six respectively are: 38,325; 38,848; 39,455; 41,693; 38,622; and 41,973.

Drawing district lines is not an easy process. Along with numbers, other factors are taken into consideration in order to cater to different communities and their interests. As floridaredistricting.org notes, “Those districts tell the stories of their communities.”

In telling the stories of the six Orlando districts, the Board disclosed that they also made the following considerations, which are typical of redistricting calculations:

1. Creating compact districts

2. Neutral consideration to political parties

3. Drawing natural boundaries

4. Keeping neighborhoods in the same district

5. Keeping communities of interests together

6. Maintaining the core areas of other districts

Some are hoping that the plan will pass and secure Orlando’s first Hispanic-majority district. Under the proposed plan, district two is 52.7 percent Hispanic. This should not come as surprise because over the past 10 years Orlando’s Hispanic population has increased approximately eight percent city wide and approximately fifteen percent in district two.

Others do not look as favorably upon this plan. While Orlando stands to gain a Hispanic-majority district, it also stands to lose one of its two Black-majority districts. District six is a Black-majority district, but under the proposed plan, the black population of district six will fall to 42.7 percent. This would be the first time in 30 years that the black population of district six would fall below half.

So, what happens next?

Over the next few months, the Florida legislature will review the plan. After months of review, if accepted, the plans will be enacted between January 10, 2012 and March 9, 2012.

Student contributor from William and Mary Law School.

permalink: http://stateofelections.pages.wm.edu/2011/11/30/fl-redistricting/

in-depth article

http://writemypaper4me.org

Florida FL redistricting, Florida, Redistricting

Primary Sidebar

Pages

  • About Us
  • Election Law Glossary
  • Staff History
  • Links
  • Archived Pages
    • Citizens United + The States
    • Virginia Redistricting Competition

Search

View Posts by State

Archives

Tags

2016 Election 2020 Election Absentee ballots absentee voting Ballot Access ballot initiative Campaign Finance Citizens United Colorado Disenfranchise disenfranchisement Early Voting Election 2016 Electronic Voting Felon Voting Rights First Amendment Gerrymandering in-depth article judicial elections mail-in voting National Voter Registration Act North Carolina photo ID primary election Redistricting Referendum Registration Secretary of State state of elections Supreme Court Texas Virginia Vote by mail Voter Fraud Voter ID Voter Identification voter registration Voter Turnout voting voting and COVID Voting Machines Voting Rights Voting Rights Act VRA William & Mary

Blogroll

  • Election Law Issues
  • William & Mary Law School
  • Williamsburg Redistricting – "The Flat Hat" article

Friends

  • W&M Election Law Program

Contact Information:

To contact us, send an email to
wmstateofelections@gmail.com

Current Editorial Staff

Brendan W. Clark ’24, Editor-in-Chief
Rachel Clyburn ’24, Editor-in-Chief

State of Elections

Copyright © 2025 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok